數(shù)字經(jīng)濟(jì)與國民經(jīng)濟(jì)核算文獻(xiàn)評(píng)述
經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)動(dòng)態(tài)
頁數(shù): 15 2019-10-18
摘要: 數(shù)字經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展對(duì)于提升全要素生產(chǎn)率、釋放經(jīng)濟(jì)活力具有重要作用。然而,數(shù)字經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展也給國民經(jīng)濟(jì)核算帶來了挑戰(zhàn),甚至大量研究認(rèn)為西方國家生產(chǎn)率放緩是由于數(shù)字經(jīng)濟(jì)帶來的核算誤差所致。相關(guān)研究發(fā)現(xiàn)數(shù)字經(jīng)濟(jì)增加了核算名義產(chǎn)出水平的難度,對(duì)準(zhǔn)確衡量國民消費(fèi)、投資和進(jìn)出口總量造成了困難。而數(shù)字經(jīng)濟(jì)引發(fā)的商品質(zhì)量快速提升和商品更迭速度加快,也容易造成物價(jià)指數(shù)被高估,從而造成實(shí)際產(chǎn)出水平被低估。此外,數(shù)字經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展帶來的福利提升在現(xiàn)有核算體系下難以衡量。本文根據(jù)現(xiàn)有文獻(xiàn)總結(jié)數(shù)字經(jīng)濟(jì)引發(fā)的產(chǎn)出水平、物價(jià)水平的核算難點(diǎn),梳理了數(shù)字經(jīng)濟(jì)核算誤差與生產(chǎn)率悖論相關(guān)性的研究探討,并列舉了國外對(duì)于改進(jìn)數(shù)字經(jīng)濟(jì)核算手段的相關(guān)貢獻(xiàn),最后提出了今后研究的潛在方向。 The development of the digital economy plays an important role in boosting TFP and releasing economic vitality. However, the development of the digital economy has also brought challenges to National Economic Accounting. A large number of studies even conclude that the productivity slowdown in Western countries is due to accounting errors brought about by the digital economy. Related studies find that the digital economy has increased the difficulty of measuring nominal output levels, making it difficult to accurately measure national consumption, investment, and total imports and exports. The rapid improvement of the quality of goods and the high rate of commodity changes caused by the digital economy are also likely to overestimate the price index, resulting in an underestimation of actual output levels. In addition, welfare enhancements brought about by the development of the digital economy are difficult to measure under the existing accounting system. Based on the existing literature, this paper summarizes the difficulties in the calculation of output levels and price levels caused by the digital economy, studies the research on the correlation between accounting errors in digital economy and productivity paradox, and lists the contributions made by foreign scholars to improving digital economic accounting methods. Finally, the potential directions for future research are proposed.