典型福利類型下0—3歲嬰幼兒托育服務(wù)的國(guó)際比較與借鑒
人口與經(jīng)濟(jì)
頁(yè)數(shù): 16 2019-03-20
摘要: 根據(jù)安德森對(duì)于福利國(guó)家類型的劃分,以丹麥、挪威、瑞典、德國(guó)、意大利、奧地利、英國(guó)、美國(guó)和愛(ài)爾蘭為例,采用新公共服務(wù)七要素理論框架,分別從理念、項(xiàng)目、方式、規(guī)范、機(jī)制、政策與效果方面總結(jié)和比較了各國(guó)0—3歲嬰幼兒托育服務(wù)模式。研究發(fā)現(xiàn),社會(huì)福利類型深刻影響各國(guó)托育服務(wù)理念;在托育服務(wù)理念指導(dǎo)下,各國(guó)托育服務(wù)項(xiàng)目、方式、規(guī)范、機(jī)制與政策表現(xiàn)出明顯差異,因而導(dǎo)致了托育服務(wù)效果的不同。在此基礎(chǔ)上,進(jìn)一步提出了針對(duì)中國(guó)構(gòu)建0—3歲嬰幼兒托育服務(wù)體系的政策建議。 According to Anderson's study associated with typical welfare types, this paper summarizes and compares the child care services models for children aged 0—3 among Denmark, Norway, Sweden, Germany, Italy, Austria, United Kingdom, United States and Ireland from beliefs, contents, methods, standards, mechanisms, polices and outcomes by using The New Public Service theory framework with seven factors. It is found that the beliefs of the child care services for children aged 0—3 are deeply impacted by social welfare types. Under the different beliefs, there are significant differences for the child care services between countries in terms of contents, methods, standards, mechanisms, and polices, all of which have led to the different outcomes. Therefore, this paper finally provides some political suggestions for the child care services system in mainland China.